{"id":4794,"date":"2014-10-06T09:57:35","date_gmt":"2014-10-06T14:57:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=4794"},"modified":"2014-10-23T19:42:55","modified_gmt":"2014-10-24T00:42:55","slug":"will-the-solutions-come-from-cities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=4794","title":{"rendered":"Will the Solutions Come from Cities?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"NYC<\/a>

Image: Wikimedia<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

It wasn\u2019t terribly surprising that the recent UN Climate Summit didn\u2019t yield anything substantive, much less binding. After all, twenty years of world conferences and summits haven\u2019t achieved much. Meanwhile, we\u2019ve been dithering away the time while greenhouse gas levels have been rising, making it harder and harder to avoid horrific impacts.<\/p>\n

So where\u2019s the EcoOptimism?<\/p>\n

Turns out it\u2019s not with national governments at all, and that\u2019s reason for hope. (Especially given the dysfunctional US federal government, hobbled by a Congress<\/a> filled with the willfully illiterate.) In its stead, lower level officials, notably mayors, have been leading from the bottom up, changing mundane things like building codes and transportation programs.<\/p>\n

Mayors lead cities, and cities are where a majority of us 7 billion humans live. Urban environments, according to Edward Mazria, whose talk I wrote about in the previous post, emit 75% of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. So focusing on cities makes a lot of sense.<\/p>\n

The good news is that urban populations in the U.S. tend to be more politically progressive, voting heavily Democratic and not home to many climate change deniers. Thus mayors have political support for positive actions. Plus, as Grist points out<\/a>, they\u2019re \u201cnot beholden to rural, fossil-fuel dependent constituencies.\u201d<\/p>\n

The latest evidence for this alternative to pin our hopes on is NYC Mayor De Blasio\u2019s announcement<\/a>, timed to coincide with the summit, of new goals for energy efficiency<\/a> of buildings in the city, designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent by 2050 from 2005 levels.<\/p>\n

\"GHGs<\/a><\/p>\n

In my previous post, I wrote about the pivotal role architects have in achieving energy efficiency and GHG reductions. That dovetails nicely with this urban direction, especially in cases like NYC where so much of the environmental impact comes from buildings. (Because more people use mass transit and fewer people drive cars, the transportation impact in dense cities tends to be lower.)<\/p>\n

These bottom up initiatives have the potential create a trickle up effect to the national level. As cities embark on these programs \u2013 and presuming they are successful \u2013 they may provide the precedents as well as the political cover for Congress to come around.<\/p>\n

So we shouldn\u2019t give up on the Feds. While action from them is extremely unlikely currently, urban programs that are both ecologically and economically successful will disprove the allegations of the climate denier lobby.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>