{"id":4833,"date":"2014-12-29T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-12-29T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=4833"},"modified":"2014-12-29T09:37:15","modified_gmt":"2014-12-29T14:37:15","slug":"2014-word-of-the-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=4833","title":{"rendered":"2014 Word of the Year"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Silos,<\/a>

Silos, but not the type we mean. Image source: Wikipedia<\/a>.<\/p><\/div>\n

If two years constitutes a tradition, then I guess EcoOptimism\u2019s Word of the Year is now a tradition.<\/p>\n

Two years ago, I chose resilience<\/a>. At that point, pre-Sandy, its meaning in an environmental context was not well known. Now, it seems, it\u2019s used everywhere. 2013\u2019s word was transparency<\/a>. Again, its general usage was understood, but I was referring to the availability of environmental and health information of chemicals, products and materials. In fact, the previous post<\/a> to this one talked about, among other things, the issue that the impacts of many chemicals and process \u2013 the post was about fracking \u2013 are still not known and, if they become known, the information is not made transparent enough.<\/p>\n

For 2014, EcoOptimism\u2019s Word of the Year is silos. Once again, it\u2019s a word that is understood in its traditional meaning, i.e. a container, usually but not always cylindrical and tall, to hold grain or other materials. It can also refer to an underground container that holds missiles before they are launched.<\/p>\n

What we are interested in here is its newer usage as a container for information or groups of people. In our highly technical world, knowledge tends to be segregated into topics and people tend to be separated into professions. That\u2019s a problem for a topic like sustainability which often requires multidisciplinary approaches to complex (or \u201cwicked<\/a>\u201d) problems.<\/p>\n

(In fact, wicked problems was a runner up for this year\u2019s word. Perhaps I\u2019ll reserve it for 2015. Phew, I won\u2019t have to sweat coming up with something next December.)<\/p>\n

Ecological problems are nothing if not complex. Think about the extraordinary computing ability it takes to create climate forecasts. But behind the unfathomable amount of bytes of information required is human-generated information, taken from many fields. The fields of course include climatology, but also delve into chemistry, biology, physics and even \u201csoft\u201d sciences like sociology and population growth. That means scientists, engineers and others have to emerge out of their professional silos to exchange information and, sometimes, to work together. The same is true for that 2012 word, resilience. It involves (again) climatology but also meteorology, geography, civil engineering, architecture, urban planning, emergency management, etc. The information and the people have to be networked in order to come up with plans and solutions that might actually work.<\/p>\n

Working alone, any of those professions will likely come to conclusions that don\u2019t take into account all the factors, resulting in unintended side effects. A civil engineer proposal to build flood gates may not realize that it causes other areas to flood. A design for a building might not raise critical machinery above flood levels. (That\u2019s what happened during Superstorm Sandy at both the Con Ed plant that exploded and NYU-Langone Hospital.)<\/p>\n

What\u2019s instead required comes in the form of an unwieldy word: desiloization. (It\u2019s probably not even a word; spellcheck hasn\u2019t the faintest what to do with it.) More simply, we refer to breaking down silos. It’s the way we get to EcoOptimism-style win-win-win approaches. So what we actually need is the opposite of our Word of the Year. But there\u2019s no way I was going to choose desiloization.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>