{"id":4849,"date":"2015-01-19T12:24:26","date_gmt":"2015-01-19T17:24:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=4849"},"modified":"2015-01-20T16:00:21","modified_gmt":"2015-01-20T21:00:21","slug":"surprise-environmentalism-actually-boosts-the-economy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=4849","title":{"rendered":"Surprise: Environmentalism Actually Boosts the Economy"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Source:<\/a>

Source: Flickr<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

One of the premises of EcoOptimism is that environmental actions and solutions complement the economy. Too often, the assumption \u2013 particularly within the business world and among conservatives \u2013 is that the opposite is true. They believe, sometimes fervently, that environmental rules and regulation are a drag on the economy, causing job losses and working against the interests of capitalism and growth.<\/p>\n

But by almost all capitalist measures, environmentalism has proved to be an aid to the economy. I was struck by this with an assortment of posts all in one day. The first was a report<\/a> stating the U.S. solar industry now employs close to 174,000 jobs and grew at a rate of 28% in the past year, nearly 20 times faster than the overall economy. Few sectors, including oil, can make a claim like that. In fact, 1.3% of the jobs created in the past year were in solar industries.<\/p>\n

\"Source:<\/a>

Source: SustainableBusiness.com<\/a>. Their caption reads: \u201cThis year, the solar industry expects to add 35,000 jobs, bringing the total to 210,060, a 20.9% increase.\u201d<\/p><\/div>\n

A related post<\/a> compared this to the number of jobs created in fossil fuel industries last year. The oil and gas industry, including pipeline construction, added just 19,000 jobs, compared to solar\u2019s 31,000. And according to the US Energy Information Administration, coal mining jobs fell by 11.3%<\/a> in 2012, a year in which solar jobs grew<\/em> by 13%.<\/p>\n

Bear in mind that this is looking at only solar jobs and related growth, not the entire arena of renewables. Wind is another area of rapid growth compared to the rest of the economy. A new report<\/a> from the advocacy group Oceana found that \u201coffshore wind [in the Atlantic] would produce twice the number of jobs and twice the amount of energy as offshore drilling in the Atlantic Ocean.\u201d As would be expected, pro-oil advocacy groups, who are promoting drilling for gas and oil off the East Coast, claim that that would create thousands of jobs and generate millions of dollars in revenue for states. Oceana says, though, those numbers are inflated because they are based on drilling in sites that are not economically viable. (Especially as the price of oil falls as it has in recent weeks.)<\/p>\n

\"offshore<\/a><\/p>\n

Furthermore, according to Oceana, drilling could put other jobs and industries, including fishing and tourism, at risk. This could have a much great economic impact: a potential loss of 1.4 million jobs and over $95 billion in gross domestic product. Wind, on the other hand, poses little risk. (Bird kills, while a concern, are smaller offshore and, in any case, are far lower than the aviary impact of air pollution and global climate disruption.)<\/p>\n

\"Source:<\/a>

Source: Flickr<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

All this makes renewable energy, to put it in Republican terms, a \u201cjob creator.\u201d If only the Republican Party weren\u2019t beholden to fossil fuel interests, perhaps they would see that and would see that this is, in EcoOptimism terms, a win-win solution.<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>