The major exception has been medical applications. Yes, hospitals and doctors\u2019 offices functioned without them in times past, but medical care has changed and SUPs in the form of things such as biohazard containers and IV bags would be difficult if not impossible to replace. And in many cases, finding ways to sterilize used items is simply not cost-effective, which makes their existence even more crucial in this pandemic. No one has seriously suggested eliminating those applications of SUPs.<\/p>\n
In fighting COVID-19, those who have reduced or removed SUPs from their lives face a distasteful choice in order to preserve those lives. Plastic bags and disposable gloves surround us, and it\u2019s difficult in this moment to eliminate them from our daily lives, let alone admonish others.<\/p>\n
[Update: since writing this post, the necessity of bagging food in plastic bags has been disproven<\/a>. It’s disappointing that most people and delivery services are still using plastic. I was happy to see the other day that our chain drugstore offered only paper bags and charged 5c for them, per NYS law. But that seems, so far, to be an exception.]<\/span><\/p>\n When I received a grocery delivery (yes, we got a delivery slot after a week), it came in a trunk load of plastic bagged items. Compounding this evil was the fact that those bags had \u2013 finally – just been banned in New York State, where I live. But it was hard to argue with the appropriateness of the packaging, much of it double-bagged. And we were, if not overjoyed, at least relieved to see our tomatoes and carrots bagged in plastic within the plastic. In fact, thinking of the at-risk elderly parents we are isolating with, we selected produce that was pre-packaged in those clamshell plastic containers or sealed plastic bags in the theory that they had been handled less than loose items.<\/p>\n You could see this as putting ourselves selfishly ahead of the planet, an equation that had been written much differently until now. We could rationalize that it wasn\u2019t actually selfish, that we were contributing to the health of others who, despite carefulness and social distancing, we might put at risk.<\/p>\n In order to partially justify those grocery bags, we sequestered them for a few days so that we could reuse them. They\u2019ve become handy for uses like safely handling the mail.<\/p>\n sequestering plastics bags so we can reuse them<\/p><\/div>\n The question is what our attitude toward plastic bags and take-out utensils will be when this is all over. Will, for instance, that NYS plastic bag ban that took years to achieve be revoked? Will the recent resistance to plastic straws \u2013 even though they have little to do with contagion – be lost? Or, will the need to return to normalcy also mean moving ahead with environmental movements that had been becoming mainstream? And another possibility: that we will see climate change for what it is, a slow-moving pandemic<\/a>. (The bad news: we have a president who has called both of them a hoax.)<\/p>\n Is it \u201ctoo soon\u201d to start talking about this? Perhaps. But whether the answers are ones that we want to hear or not, it\u2019s important for our own and everyone\u2019s wellbeing, emotionally as well as environmentally, that we think beyond our temporary crisis.<\/p>\n![\"plastic](\"http:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/plastic-bags-500.jpg\")
<\/a>Share this:<\/h3>