{"id":778,"date":"2013-02-27T11:38:42","date_gmt":"2013-02-27T16:38:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=778"},"modified":"2013-07-07T17:03:11","modified_gmt":"2013-07-07T22:03:11","slug":"community-and-sustainability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ecooptimism.com\/?p=778","title":{"rendered":"Community and Sustainability"},"content":{"rendered":"

Far too many environmental conferences and discussions are repetitive and uninspiring. Frequently, we find ourselves preaching to the choir, perhaps just trying to impress each other. Then, every once in a while, an event manages to bring together the right \u201cvibes,\u201d and that\u2019s when ideas can coalesce and energize.<\/p>\n

I found myself in one of those happy circumstances this past weekend at \u201cUnderstanding Urban Sustainability: One Block at a Time,\u201d hosted by the Cooper Union Institute for Sustainable Design (CUISD<\/a>) and the Fourth Arts Block (FABnyc<\/a>).<\/p>\n

The Fourth Street Arts Block is within shouting distance (trucks, buses and horns notwithstanding) of Cooper Union. The block is home to several Off-Broadway theaters (among other productions, \u201cRent\u201d began there) as well as typical NYC tenements, many with residents whose families have lived there for generations. It\u2019s also adjacent to the Bowery, which is undergoing a Renaissance \u2013 probably its first ever \u2013 with hotels and museums replacing flophouses and used restaurant supply stores.<\/p>\n

The block is the only official \u201ccultural district\u201d in NYC, but what interested me is that FABnyc has also embarked on a mission to green the block. To that end, they have a project with Cooper Union<\/a> \u201cto generate new and innovative solutions to the complexities of urban sustainability.\u201d In addition, their \u201cModel Block\u201d program has undertaken energy efficiency steps such as enabling buildings on the block to install white roofs and obtain energy audits.<\/p>\n

At the event, the questions revolved around what else FABnyc could be doing and how it might be looked at as a model for other blocks. As the discussions evolved, several topics I\u2019d been pondering began to come together. In my recent columns (here<\/a>, here<\/a> and here<\/a>) on the Lower East Side redevelopment project called SPURA<\/a>, I spent a fair amount of time discussing neighborhood and street vitality, focusing on how monolithic buildings and big box stores sap energy compared to the way older \u201cMain Street\u201d type designs work.<\/p>\n

This is not news, of course. The realization has been around since Jane Jacobs wrote about it and, in more recent years, Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk<\/a> have concentrated on it as has Kaid Benfield (though his recent posts<\/a> have lamented that Main Street\u2019s future may not be all it\u2019s cracked up to be).<\/p>\n

Fourth Street\u2019s architecture is pretty intact in that the buildings are walk-ups and most have storefronts on their ground level. So there is a constant level of activity and interaction involving residents, shop owners, dog walkers, theater attendees and others. The stores range from a small scale food co-op that\u2019s been there for decades to a newcomer artisanal chocolate shop (highly recommended!). When the street is closed for a festival, it\u2019s not the typical characterless affair that abounds in NYC summers with sock vendors and greasy food, but instead has performances, local artists selling jewelry and classes to teach kids to ride bicycles.<\/p>\n

\"FAB_1sm\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"FAB_2sm\"<\/a><\/p>\n

FAB! Festival photos by Lori Greenberg<\/em><\/h5>\n

What\u2019s the connection to sustainability? One of the biggest issues in sustainability is disengagement. Many, if not most, people feel that any efforts they might be able to undertake are too difficult or, more commonly, too insignificant to matter. Living (or working) on a block or in a neighborhood where anonymity is the rule discourages any sense of ownership, of belonging to something larger than just you. Simultaneously, this means you have less incentive to participate and less sense of responsibility to a community. This can contribute to any number of \u201cquality of life\u201d problems like noise and littering. If you don\u2019t know your neighbors, you\u2019re less likely to care.<\/p>\n

The digital world has exacerbated this problem. Several conference attendees commented that their blocks and communities became closer during the post-Sandy blackout because people were forced to leave their computers, X-boxes and televisions. People who lived across the street from each other or even next door met for the first time. This phenomenon resulted in some mostly tongue-in-cheek suggestions that we have regular planned blackouts. (It\u2019s worth noting, though, that the Internet and email can also support block associations and bulletin boards and the like.)<\/p>\n

It\u2019s fairly apparent that a key to sustainability is popular support and participation \u2013 buy-in, some call it. Active street life can foster this in ways that high-rise apartment buildings, even when built to the street line, and towers-in-the-park cannot. For instance, one of my suggestions for future projects was a block collection system for compost. NYC currently does not have compost collection (though they\u2019re looking into it). In the meanwhile, residents have to store their compost at home (keep in mind that most of us do not have outdoor space) and then take it themselves to a collection center on appointed days. That\u2019s too much work and too much icky-ness for most. But if communities were to set up local, perhaps self-run systems, my bet is many more would participate \u2013 even without the \u201cstick\u201d of government requirements \u2013 and we might even see friendly competition to see whose building composts and recycles the most.<\/p>\n

(There\u2019s a question of critical mass here, too. How much density is needed to achieve the activity and street vitality that supports community involvement? And while it\u2019s pretty obvious there\u2019s a minimum density, is there a maximum? It\u2019s a topic worthy of a post of its own, which is what I will do soon.)<\/p>\n

At the end of the event, I brought up that this was an almost perfect application of the old environmental slogan \u201cThink Global, Act Local.\u201d Strengthening communities can get people out of their individual shells and lead to more involvement in and buy-in of local eco practices, which in turn can get people thinking on the larger global level since the world is, after all, just a much larger community.<\/p>\n

\"ThinkGloballyActLocally\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>